April 2, 2008
GMFS Why Aren't they labeled?
http://impact.typepad.com/articles/2006/01/how_should_gene.html?cid=109149416#comment-109149416
This article talks about the fact that GMFS are not labeled in the United States. In many European countries, it is mandatory to label genetically modified foods, but it is only voluntary in this country. WHY!!!!!!!!!?????????? Well according to the article, mandating the labeling of GMFs can bring down profits in stores because consumers may perceive the labels as a "WARNING" and choose not to buy it. BUT! it's their right! The fact that GMFs are not labeled is ridiculous! Just propostrous!
Posted by Valdeezy at 1:28 PM 1 comments
If Gene Therapy Is the Cure, What Is the Disease?
Posted by IFEOMA at 1:28 PM 0 comments
Labels: african shawty
Stem Cell Cons (Arguments as to why it shouldn't happen)
http://media.www.thejambar.com/media/storage/paper324/news/2008/04/01/Opinion/Say-No.To.Embryonic.Stem.Cell.Research-3295342.shtml
Posted by CindyK at 1:24 PM 0 comments
Transgenic Animals:Enivormental and Health Concerns
http://www.alive.com/4064a3a2.php?subject_bread_cramb=635
This article expresses the enviromental and health concerns of transgenic animals. It at the same time explains the need for transgenic animals. Transgenic animals can be used for organ transplants, meat production, diary production, diesase resistance and et cetera. However there are worries that that transgenic animals are capable of mating with wild stock. One transgenic animal that is being approved for food is the AquAdvantage salmon. In fact according to this article,escapes from fish farms are common. Also safety regulations covering the enviromental and health concerns over transgennic animals have not yet been finalized.
Posted by Merlo Philiossaint at 1:15 PM 0 comments
If Gene Therapy Is the Cure, What Is the Disease?
Posted by IFEOMA at 1:12 PM 0 comments
Labels: african shawty
Catherine's Article on antiretroviral medications
Deliver AIDS Treatment and Prevention
https://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/355/11/1081
The researchers believe that if they get expose to the antiretroviral medications to uninfected persons who are at high risk will prevent infection. There is concern about the safety of this method, the potential for selection of resistant viruses, and the wisdom and acceptability of initiating long-term antiretroviral treatment in healthy people.
Posted by cAtHeRiNe at 1:04 PM 0 comments
Five drops of blood: Invasion of privacy?
http://www.startribune.com/lifestyle/health/11345741.html
Sumamry:
This article basically talks about a babay who had five drops of blood taken from her 24 hours after she was born. These drops of vblood were taken to help determine whether or not this child has any of the 50 rare hereditary conditions that could be detected and treated. Minnesota doctors say that this saves many lives. However, some argue that this is an invasion of privacy. Doctors want to add other diseases to the newborn screening test. One parent, Ella, thinks that this test should not be optional. So basically, this article is leaning towards the pro side of the argument.
Posted by Debbie at 1:03 PM 0 comments